- Home
- Governance
- Academic Senate
- Academic Senate Committees
- Committee on Computer Resources
- E-Newsletter
CCR News (Spring 2024)
The Committee on Computer Resources' Newsletter
Articles: How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bot: ChatGPT Has Landed by Larisa Honey, Ph.D. (Social Sciences) ♦ Nursing Resource Center & Simulation Lab by Lauren Ellis, DNP, FNP-BC, CHSE & Michelle Rossi MSN, RN (Nursing) ♦ An Interview with Tadeusz (Ted) B. Dec by Ron Van Cleef, Ph.D. (History) and Anuradha Srivastava, Ph.D. (Biological Sciences and Geology) ♦ CCR Report on 10th Annual Faculty Development Retreat, Artificial Intelligence in Academia by Jonggu Moon M.D. (HPED)
How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bot
By: Larisa Honey, Ph.D. (Social Sciences)
ChatGPT Has Landed
As we approach the one-year anniversary of the ChatGPT era of academia, the Computer Resources Committee decided it would be a good time to devote our newsletter to the implications of this new technology on our teaching practices here at QCC and to reflect upon our own experiences teaching in this tumultuous and unfamiliar territory.
Since ChatGPT’s public launch on November 30, 2022, followed shortly by Google’s Bard platform, Artificial Technologies (AI) have ignited a firestorm of reactions across the educational spectrum. Between January and September 2023, the Chronicle of Higher Education alone published 144 articles on the topic. Ranging from mild amusement to out and out panic, the education community has been busy researching and reacting to this new intrusion into our lives. Just one week after its introduction to the public, Stephen Marche of The Atlantic dramatically declared that The College Essay is Dead. Many worried about the plagiarism implications of this new tool, and articles began popping up with suggestions about How to spot a ChatGPT Cheater.
As faculty began experimenting with the technology, it quickly became clear that ChatGPT apps were producing passing level assignments and exams. Anthropologist Kiersten Snover sent a series of introductory level essay exam questions through the app, and found the answers adequate and in some cases superior to what she expects from first year students. Maya Bodnik, an undergraduate student at Harvard, conducted an informal study of ChatGPT essays in 7 Harvard courses - Micro and Macroeconomics, Latin American Politics, The American Presidency, Conflict Resolution, Intermediate Spanish, and Freshman Seminar on Proust - and found that it was able to produce A or B work for most of them. Soon news articles began appearing claiming that ChatGPT could pass the bar exam and even medical school! And this past Spring, confirming everyone’s fears, Columbia university student Owen Kichizo Terry spilled the beans on student plagiarism in his piece, “ I’m a Student. You Have No Idea How Much We’re Using ChatGPT.”
Not all articles have been negative or alarmist in nature. Edutopia highlighted Six Ways to Use ChatGPT to Save Time, including for outlining, lesson planning, presentations, summarizing and even for designing discussion questions. The NYTimes Ethicist supported the use of ChatGPT for menial tasks that generally follow a template, such as annual reports, job search blurbs, and curriculum revisions. Some faculty have been less than impressed with the output of the ChatGPT bots. Peter Herman, professor of English at San Diego State University, found that the essays produced by ChatGPT3 were mediocre and would earn an F grade in his class. Further tempering the anxiety surrounding ChatGPT’s academic abilities, one controversial study claiming that ChatGPT could successfully complete MIT’s programs in Mathematics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, has been withdrawn from publication following the close analysis and critique by three MIT graduate students.
Writing for University World News, historian Nathan Greenfield cautioned against further enflaming a ‘moral panic’ around the technology and encourages faculty to explore creative ways to integrate ChatGPT into their assignments in order to promote critical thinking and creativity. In the computer programming field, some have now introduced critiques of the technology into the curriculum. Continuing in this vein, anthropologist Elisa Sobo of San Diego State University cautions against ‘catastrophizing’ ChatGPT technology and encourages faculty not to allow it to create an adversarial relationship between teachers and students and to rather “focus on the cooperative and mutualist side of the equation” and on the process of writing and learning rather than simply focusing on the final product.
To this end, last winter a group of educators from the CUNY Graduate Center put together guidelines for dealing with ChatGPT in the classroom. Cathy Davidson, Distinguished Professor of English, Digital Humanities, Data Analysis and Visualization, called ChatGPT a long-awaited wake up call, one we should have heeded when the world wide web became widely available to the public in 1993. She views ChatGPT as an opportunity for developing new types of assignments. For example, given the accuracy limitations of the technology, students could be tasked with fact checking and reference checking ChatGPT responses. Roderick Hurley, a psychology graduate student, argues that ChatGPT should be discussed in the classroom, particularly with regards to issues of equity and impact. He encourages faculty to consider how this technology may exacerbate inequalities on campus. Luke Waltzer, Director of the Graduate Center’s Teaching and Learning Center advises faculty not to take on an adversarial relationship with students. Rather than focusing on cheating and the misuse of the technology, he encourages us to find ways to enhance our teaching and assessment practices in such a way that ChatGPT is no longer such an obstacle. Matthew Gold, professor of English, Digital Humanities, Data Analysis and Visualization, reminds us that “fears around disruptive technology and cheating aren’t new” and that "Technology has not brought about the end of human creativity in the past and this also will not destroy our human spirit.”
One final message that I want to highlight from this blossoming new field of ChatGPT studies pertains to academic writing more generally. In their thought-provoking piece “Don’t Write Like a Robot” James M. Lang and Michelle D. Miller discuss ChatGPT through the editorial lens with their Teaching and Learning in Higher Education series at West Virginia University. They see the scrutiny of ChatGPT language and its near-human abilities as an opportunity to explore and improve upon academic writing, which they view as too often stripped of the personal and emotional elements that drive good writing in the public sphere. Too often, they note, faculty approach their writing with a cold objectivity that more resembles a robot than a human. In their educational series, they note, it is those works that include a more personal touch that are more successful and likely to be published. They advise academics to “share their passion” in their academic writing and to “inject some humanity” into it. As an anthropologist, I wholeheartedly agree.
I see several important takeaways from these articles. ChatGPT is here, and we need to take it seriously and work to understand it. Faculty should familiarize themselves with the technology and use it as an opportunity for exploring our own assignments as well as broader social issues such as equity, accessibility and ethics. While the technology does pose significant challenges, we can learn from it, and to that end QCC has recently established a task force to draft guidelines and a plan for action.
An Interview with Tadeusz (Ted) B. Dec
By: Ron Van Cleef, Ph.D. (History) and Anuradha Srivastava, Ph.D. (Biological Sciences and Geology)
The Cochairs of the Committee on Computer Resources (CCR) met with Tadeusz (Ted) B. Dec, who is the Chief Information Officer at Queensborough Community College (QCC) on November 20, 2023. Ted was kind enough to meet with us to introduce himself and answer our questions about information technology at QCC.
Can you tell us a bit about your background before coming to QCC?
I attended the Silesian University of Technology in Poland before coming to the United States in 1988. After working for a while in a number of labor related jobs, I eventually attended classes at the TCI College of Technology in New York City. Later, I enrolled in programs at CUNY’s LaGuardia and Queens College –– eventually earning my BS and MA degrees. During that time, I managed a network system for an insurance firm before taking a position as a Director of Network Administration and Assistant to the Vice President of Information Technology at LaGuardia Community College. Later, I moved on to become the Executive Director of Network Operations at St. Joseph’s University, New York where I worked for over thirteen years.
When did you begin working at the college and what are your main responsibilities?
I joined Queensborough Community College as the Chief Information Officer in January 2023. My main responsibility is overseeing information technology at QCC. This concerns a number of management and support areas relating to business management, classroom technology, computer systems, cybersecurity, data access, implementing new technologies, software installation, and telecommunication networks. I am also responsible for overseeing the College’s Help Desk. In my capacity as Chief Information Officer I also work closely with the Academic Computing Center, the Office of Educational Technology, the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, and a number of other departments at the College.
Can you give us a brief description of the information technology services available to the campus community?
Well, the Office of Information Technology provides assistance and support in a number of areas relating to system networks, software applications, computer hardware, CUNYfirst access, and email support. Most of these services are accessible by contacting the main Help Desk which can be reached by phone at (718) 631-6348 or by emailing [email protected]. The Academic Computing Center, the Office of Educational Technology, and the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment also offer a variety of services for the campus community. Information concerning these resources can be found on their individual homepages via the QCC website. (see below)
We know you are new to QCC, but do you have a sense of how the recent COVID pandemic impacted the use of information technology at the college?
The immediate challenge was assisting faculty, staff, and students in the shift to working remotely from their existing in–person format and full time online education. Members of the campus community needed a great deal of support with accessing equipment, maintaining connectivity, and working online. The level of assistance that individuals required varied according to their technical skills and the resources at their disposal. Most everyone required help in some capacity.
It was also important to maintain the supply and upkeep of the existing systems, which could be difficult in the face of component and equipment scarcities. Not only did the College need to ensure adequate access to technology for the campus community, but the overall system needed to be maintained properly. Often, there were long waits and other types of challenges in acquiring the needed materials.
What types of technology–related challenges do you see QCC facing currently or in the near future? Is there anything members of the QCC community can do to better prepare?
One of the biggest challenges that comes to mind concerns cybersecurity. This is of course an issue for society as a whole, but a number of college campuses have been hit by hackers recently. Baruch College for example, suffered a malware attack in late September which disrupted their system and forced them to rely on remote classes for several days.
Everyone, not just people working with technology, needs to be vigilant in safeguarding their passwords and personal information. Sometimes hacker attacks come in the form of an email or text asking you to click links or provide information concerning an account you may have. These emails can appear to come from any number of agencies, businesses, financial institutions, utility services or any other organization (PayPal or Venmo for example). Whenever possible, contact the particular organization directly or visit their secure website to update any information. It would also be a good idea for people to familiarize themselves with the sorts of threats out there. The Office of Information Technology regularly circulates information concerning cybersecurity issues via email and workshops on internet security are available as well. (see link below)
Aside from issues relating to cybersecurity there are other information–technology challenges that have developed recently. This includes Artificial Intelligence (AI) which has both its positive and negative elements. Artificial Intelligence is useful for many organizations as it can perform a number of tasks including the quick collection and organization of data. AI also presents new problems though. Certainly, it has been a challenge to teaching faculty in the form of chatbots like ChatGPT and similar applications which are often misused by students to generate assignments illegitimately. AI also presents challenges to programmers and others working with information technology as it can contribute to cybersecurity threats and cause other problems.
Other developments affecting the QCC community concern the adoption of new software applications and technology. For example, the College will be transitioning from the Blackboard learning management system to Brightspace. Similarly, the Starfish application will soon be replaced by EAB Navigate. The campus community should participate in any training or information workshops concerning these applications provided by CUNY or QCC currently or in the near future.
As a follow-up to that last question, can you suggest any resources that might be helpful for the Queensborough community in general?
QCC/CUNY Resources:
Office of Educational Technology
Office of Information Technology (general)
Office of Information Technology (cybersecurity)
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Additional Resources:
Brightspace Resources (information from both QCC and outside resources)
https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/brightspace/
https://www.cuny.edu/academics/brightspace-transition/
EAB Navigate (An outside site has information about the application replacing Starfish)
Have I Been Pwned (This site that detects if your email address was involved in a data breach)
Can you provide us with your office’s contact information?
Yes, I am located in the Administration building, room A-303 and my phone number is 718-631-6273.
I can be reached by email at: [email protected].
Nursing Resource Center & Simulation Lab
By: Lauren Ellis, DNP, FNP-BC, CHSE (Nursing) & Michelle Rossi MSN, RNĀ (Nursing)
Simulation Laboratory
The Simulation laboratory in Queensborough’s Nursing Resource Center provides nursing students an opportunity to practice acquired skills. Nurse educators utilize evidence-based scenarios which range from differences in acuity. This cutting- edge environment allows students to learn in a safe space to provide quality patient care. The simulated hospital allows students to practice team collaboration, critical thinking, psychomotor and assessment skills. In order to provide clinical excellence and promote cultural awareness, the simulation resources incorporate diverse patient simulators, multi-ethnicities and scenarios.
The lab is comprised of:
- __6__ high-fidelity patient simulators: _1_ SimMan3G, _2_SimBaby, __1_SimNewB, __1_SimJr., and a birthing simulator – 1 SimMom_____
- __2__ Medium Fidelity patient simulators: __2___ multi-ethnic Nursing Annes,
- __2___Low-fidelity patient simulators
- Various task trainers such as: __1_Moma Birthie (half body), Trask trainers' IV arms
- Labor and delivery room
- Pediatric Ward
- Isolation room
The LUM NRC is located in the nursing department. It is a center that permits students to access web based programs to assist with test taking and offers a quiet area to study. The administrative staff assists with the proctoring and the generation of reports for the HESI/Evolve online program. The students will conduct their testing utilizing the ExamSoft online testing program. The center has a main server which is installed and maintains all of the software & hardware. The equipment utilized ensures an optimal workstation/server performance. All computers are updated in the resource Center with the latest ExamSoft updates. The administrative team frequently checks and updates the network infrastructure and peripherals accordingly i.e. printers and related hardware. The Resource Center is permitted for use by Nursing Students who wish to study placidly. The Lum NRC center additionally has a small room with a whiteboard. The students are permitted to utilize the board and study in groups. In addition to the computer access the students additionally may borrow books and have access to an array of DVD’s centralized around their studies.
CCR REPORT FROM EVENT: 10th Annual Faculty Development Retreat, Artificial Intelligence in Academia
By: Jonggu Moon MD (HPED)
March 1, 2024 Friday 9am to 3pm
Submitted by Jonggu Moon MD, Lecturer QCC HPED
There was a keynote speaker followed by a panel discussion, each for the morning and again for the afternoon.
MORNING KEYNOTE:
Dr. Dara Byrne, Assoc Provost Dean Undergraduate Studies Macaulay Honors College, gave the morning keynote. She shared her experience leading a project to use AI to identify students at risk of dropping out or "stepping out." Stepping out is when a student declines to register for the next semester but has the intention of returning later. Unfortunately, the project has discovered that most who “step out” end up not returning. Dr. Byrne cautioned against using AI like this because a former student of hers asked if this was like predictive policing. Users of AI must be mindful of biases in the base data (see database example). BIBO or "Bias In, Bias Out" is a paraphrase of the old computer term GIGO "Garbage In, Garbage Out."(See for additional information: “Bias in AI is coming: How search engines reinforce racism.”)
Dr. Byrne explained that software developers are mostly concerned with making the technology possible and leave it up to others to determine how it is used. We as educators then must take that responsibility to push for appropriate use of AI. She encourages us to be the "mosquito in the room", meaning that while we may not have as much power as big tech and the military that is driving AI development, educators can continuously annoy the big players to influence how they are used.
Our job is not to be technologists. It is to ask the hard questions. As Martin Luther King pointed out "The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. But education which stops with efficiency may prove the greatest menace to society.
Faculty responsibilities include: Metrics of fairness, Transparency, GIGO training, Point out distinction between Code vs Policy choices, Identify best practices. Point out the expanding gap of haves vs have nots. How to make AI accessible to students? (For example see, N.A.I.R.R. National Artificial Intelligence Research Resources Pilot)
MORNING PANEL :
Dr. Gouzhen An, QCC Engineering Tech Natural Language
Dr. Scott Litroff, QCC Music Faculty Governance
Dr. Sumaya Villanueva, John Jay, Academic Engagement
Dr. Esma Yildrim, QCC Computer Science Big Data
Moderator Dr. Forough Ghahramani, NJEdge Inc.
AI is taking over entry level jobs. How will new hires gain the experience to become supervisors? The next in-demand skills will be how to use AI. We must teach them or else they will not get hired. Should we still teach how to do entry level work?
AI is great for brainstorming. This is a fantastic time to be a learner of any age.
AFTERNOON KEYNOTE:
"Empowering Our Academic Community: Elevating AI Literacy and Integrating AI Policies into Our Syllabi" Dr. Shiang-Kwei Wang, VP Academic Affairs and Provost Hostos Community College, spoke of the concerns of AI: Privacy, Accuracy, Reliability, Ethics, Social Impact (fake news). Your input influences future output for all the users. (BIBO). A quick poll showed we attendees all agreed that we should embrace and enhance AI use in the classroom, not detect and discourage it. Dr. Wang showed examples using the applications Curipod to generate interactive PowerPoints and Gamma for documents
She spoke of using the Persona Pattern as a technique used in prompt engineering to provide context and guidelines for the AI model when generating responses. It allows you to specify a fictional or role-based identity for the AI to adopt when responding to prompts. - LinkedIn. Finally, the flipped interaction pattern is a potent tool that leverages generative AI's capabilities to ask the questions needed to guide problem-solving or information gathering. - LinkedIn
AFTERNOON PANEL:
Dr. Milena Cuellar LagCC Math Tech Divide
Dr. Yusuf Danisman, QCC Math
Dr. Rob McAlear, QCC English
Ms. Ruru Rusmin, CUNY SPS, Faculty Development
Moderator Ms. Florence D. Hudson, Columbia U., Big Data
Possible future job title is "Prompt Engineer". Knowing what questions to give to AI.
Other references:
ChatGPT 3.5 is free because it is outdated.
Microsoft BING Copilot is a site licensed to CUNY. But your campus IT may have blocked it.
My own thoughts: Can AI be trained to take multiple choice exams? 23&Me went bankrupt. Do confidentiality contracts become void to whoever buys their genetic information?
The attendee panel closed.